Good, Bad And Ugly: Why Millennials Can’t Stop Romanticising 2016 On Instagram

Last Updated:January 21, 2026, 08:00 IST

From grainy photos to low-resolution videos, users are recreating the looks- skinny jeans, chokers, bomber jackets, messy eyeliner and referencing simpler times with the #2016

Millennials and older Gen Z users are posting throwbacks, side-by-side 2016 vs 2026 comparisons, and unedited snapshots from that year, collectively circling back to what now feels like a simpler, more legible version of life. (Image: Instagram/Kylie Jenner, Ananya Panday)

If you ever used the Rio de Janeiro filter, sent a Snapchat with dog ears, or waited for a Kylie Jenner lip kit restock, you already understand why the internet cannot let go of 2016. The evidence is still there, buried in your phone’s photo gallery, timestamps intact, waiting to be rediscovered.

A decade later, those images are resurfacing on Instagram in unexpected ways. Not as irony, not as parody, but as something closer to longing. Millennials and older Gen Z users are posting throwbacks, side-by-side 2016 vs 2026 comparisons, and unedited snapshots from that year, collectively circling back to what now feels like a simpler, more legible version of life.

“I was broke in 2016, but I don’t remember being anxious all the time,” says Rhea Malhotra, 35, a venture capital consultant based in Bengaluru. “Now I earn more than I ever thought I would, and yet I feel permanently behind. When I look at my 2016 photos, I don’t miss the year. I miss who I was inside it.”

What Is This 2016 Trend on Instagram?

From grainy photos, low-resolution videos to filters that mimic early smartphone cameras every post on Instagram is rejecting the hyper-polished, algorithm-friendly visual language that dominates social media in 2026. Some users are uploading original photos taken in 2016. Others are recreating the look- skinny jeans, chokers, bomber jackets, messy eyeliner. Captions referencing “simpler times”, “when life made sense” or just a before and after, even when the images themselves show nothing particularly remarkable.

Celebrities like Kylie Jenner and Hailey Rhode Bieber have joined in too, posting decade-old photos or styling themselves in a way that directly nods to the mid-2010s. Fashion brands have noticed, reviving silhouettes and styling cues that were once considered dated. What might once have been dismissed as cringe is now recast as authentic.

Why The Internet Can’t Stop Romanticising 2016?

The emotional weight of this trend rests largely with millennials. In 2016, they were in their twenties or early thirties. Many were living independently for the first time, forming adult identities without yet feeling crushed by long-term responsibility. Careers were still open-ended. Relationships felt experimental. The future, while uncertain, did not yet feel hostile.

This was the era of the Mannequin Challenge and Vine, when humour spread because it was clever, not because it was optimised. Online, people posted without overthinking how their feed looked. Instagram was not yet an exercise in personal branding. It was just somewhere to share.

“There was no pressure to explain yourself,” says Aarav Jain, 25, a product designer in Chandigarh. “I was 15 in 2016. I posted terrible photos, deleted nothing, and nobody cared. Now everything feels like it has consequences.”

There was also a sense, now almost unimaginable, that the world did not feel uncomplicated, but it felt hopeful. Pop culture too helped cement that mood with Beyoncé’s album Lemonade, a work so culturally dominant it cut across age, race and taste, turning personal pain into collective conversation.

The Good: Why 2016 Felt So Alive

There are genuine reasons why 2016 occupies such a powerful place in cultural memory. Pop culture felt communal in a way that is rare today. Music releases became shared events. Beyoncé released Lemonade, a work so culturally dominant it cut across age, race and taste, turning personal pain into collective conversation. Drake, Rihanna and Kanye West dominated conversations across platforms, creating a sense that everyone was listening to the same thing at the same time.

Internet culture felt playful rather than punitive. Viral trends like Pokémon Go brought people physically outdoors. The Mannequin Challenge was silly and harmless. Memes circulated without the weight of constant political interpretation. Social media still felt social.

Fashion was accessible and expressive rather than trend-chasing at breakneck speed. You could repeat outfits. You could dress badly without it becoming a personal brand failure. Instagram had not yet become a performance space where every post was implicitly monetisable.

The Bad: What Nostalgia Conveniently Forgets

And yet, 2016 was not the utopia memory now suggests. It was the year of Brexit. The year of a deeply polarising US election. A year marked by terror attacks, celebrity deaths and growing global unease. Many of the political and cultural fractures we are still grappling with today were already visible then.

It was also the year of demonetization in India, a sudden economic shock that disrupted daily life for millions. Long queues outside banks became routine. Small businesses suffered. Informal workers bore the brunt of uncertainty. Anxiety was everywhere, even if it was not always articulated online.

For many marginalised communities, 2016 was not safe or carefree. The sense of collective joy being remembered now was not evenly distributed. Social media already carried its darker edges: harassment, comparison, anxiety. It just had not yet reached today’s scale or intensity.

What nostalgia does is flatten complexity. It edits out discomfort and amplifies emotion. When people say they miss 2016, they are rarely referring to the year as it actually unfolded. They are remembering how they felt before the consequences of that period fully arrived.

The Ugly: When Nostalgia Becomes Haunting

There is an uncomfortable underside to this trend. The longing for 2016 often carries an implicit rejection of the present: a belief that things are irreparably worse now. What this really means is that many people feel disillusioned, overwhelmed or disconnected in 2026. Rising costs of living, burnout culture, algorithmic pressure and global instability have made optimism feel risky. Looking backwards offers emotional shelter.

But 2016 was not simply a softer, happier time. It was a year that also saw some of the most brutal acts of violence in recent memory. In India, the Uri attack on 18 September killed 19 soldiers and marked a turning point in the nation’s security narrative. It was a moment that still reverberates in public memory, yet it is often absent from the glossy, filtered versions of 2016 that flood Instagram feeds today.

Internationally, 2016 was similarly violent. In June, the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting claimed 49 lives, devastating the LGBTQ+ community and shifting conversations about hate crimes and gun control. And in France, the Bastille Day truck attack in Nice killed 86 people, including children, in a single, indiscriminate act of terror. These events were not anomalies; they were the shape of the year, even if nostalgia chooses to ignore them.

Perhaps the healthiest way to read this trend is not as regression, but as recalibration. A reminder of what people valued before everything became optimised for engagement, profit and visibility.

Instagram may be filled with 2016 right now. But what people are really searching for is something timeless, a sense that life can still feel shared, playful and meaningfully human.

“I was broke in 2016, but I don’t remember being anxious all the time,” says Rhea Malhotra, 35, a venture capital consultant based in Bengaluru. “Now I earn more than I ever thought I would, and yet I feel permanently behind. When I look at my 2016 photos, I don’t miss the year. I miss who I was inside it.”

What Is This 2016 Trend on Instagram?

From grainy photos, low-resolution videos to filters that mimic early smartphone cameras every post on Instagram is rejecting the hyper-polished, algorithm-friendly visual language that dominates social media in 2026. Some users are uploading original photos taken in 2016. Others are recreating the look- skinny jeans, chokers, bomber jackets, messy eyeliner. Captions referencing “simpler times”, “when life made sense” or just a before and after, even when the images themselves show nothing particularly remarkable.

Celebrities like Kylie Jenner and Hailey Rhode Bieber have joined in too, posting decade-old photos or styling themselves in a way that directly nods to the mid-2010s. Fashion brands have noticed, reviving silhouettes and styling cues that were once considered dated. What might once have been dismissed as cringe is now recast as authentic.

Why The Internet Can’t Stop Romanticising 2016?

The emotional weight of this trend rests largely with millennials. In 2016, they were in their twenties or early thirties. Many were living independently for the first time, forming adult identities without yet feeling crushed by long-term responsibility. Careers were still open-ended. Relationships felt experimental. The future, while uncertain, did not yet feel hostile.

This was the era of the Mannequin Challenge and Vine, when humour spread because it was clever, not because it was optimised. Online, people posted without overthinking how their feed looked. Instagram was not yet an exercise in personal branding. It was just somewhere to share.

“There was no pressure to explain yourself,” says Aarav Jain, 25, a product designer in Chandigarh. “I was 15 in 2016. I posted terrible photos, deleted nothing, and nobody cared. Now everything feels like it has consequences.”

There was also a sense, now almost unimaginable, that the world did not feel uncomplicated, but it felt hopeful. Pop culture too helped cement that mood with Beyoncé’s album Lemonade, a work so culturally dominant it cut across age, race and taste, turning personal pain into collective conversation.

The Good: Why 2016 Felt So Alive

There are genuine reasons why 2016 occupies such a powerful place in cultural memory. Pop culture felt communal in a way that is rare today. Music releases became shared events. Beyoncé released Lemonade, a work so culturally dominant it cut across age, race and taste, turning personal pain into collective conversation. Drake, Rihanna and Kanye West dominated conversations across platforms, creating a sense that everyone was listening to the same thing at the same time.

Internet culture felt playful rather than punitive. Viral trends like Pokémon Go brought people physically outdoors. The Mannequin Challenge was silly and harmless. Memes circulated without the weight of constant political interpretation. Social media still felt social.

Fashion was accessible and expressive rather than trend-chasing at breakneck speed. You could repeat outfits. You could dress badly without it becoming a personal brand failure. Instagram had not yet become a performance space where every post was implicitly monetisable.

The Bad: What Nostalgia Conveniently Forgets

And yet, 2016 was not the utopia memory now suggests. It was the year of Brexit. The year of a deeply polarising US election. A year marked by terror attacks, celebrity deaths and growing global unease. Many of the political and cultural fractures we are still grappling with today were already visible then.

It was also the year of demonetization in India, a sudden economic shock that disrupted daily life for millions. Long queues outside banks became routine. Small businesses suffered. Informal workers bore the brunt of uncertainty. Anxiety was everywhere, even if it was not always articulated online.

For many marginalised communities, 2016 was not safe or carefree. The sense of collective joy being remembered now was not evenly distributed. Social media already carried its darker edges: harassment, comparison, anxiety. It just had not yet reached today’s scale or intensity.

What nostalgia does is flatten complexity. It edits out discomfort and amplifies emotion. When people say they miss 2016, they are rarely referring to the year as it actually unfolded. They are remembering how they felt before the consequences of that period fully arrived.

The Ugly: When Nostalgia Becomes Haunting

There is an uncomfortable underside to this trend. The longing for 2016 often carries an implicit rejection of the present: a belief that things are irreparably worse now. What this really means is that many people feel disillusioned, overwhelmed or disconnected in 2026. Rising costs of living, burnout culture, algorithmic pressure and global instability have made optimism feel risky. Looking backwards offers emotional shelter.

But 2016 was not simply a softer, happier time. It was a year that also saw some of the most brutal acts of violence in recent memory. In India, the Uri attack on 18 September killed 19 soldiers and marked a turning point in the nation’s security narrative. It was a moment that still reverberates in public memory, yet it is often absent from the glossy, filtered versions of 2016 that flood Instagram feeds today.

Internationally, 2016 was similarly violent. In June, the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting claimed 49 lives, devastating the LGBTQ+ community and shifting conversations about hate crimes and gun control. And in France, the Bastille Day truck attack in Nice killed 86 people, including children, in a single, indiscriminate act of terror. These events were not anomalies; they were the shape of the year, even if nostalgia chooses to ignore them.

Perhaps the healthiest way to read this trend is not as regression, but as recalibration. A reminder of what people valued before everything became optimised for engagement, profit and visibility.

Instagram may be filled with 2016 right now. But what people are really searching for is something timeless, a sense that life can still feel shared, playful and meaningfully human.

Stay Ahead, Read Faster

Scan the QR code to download the News18 app and enjoy a seamless news experience anytime, anywhere.

login