If you’re not a job seeker or a public employee, why should you care about the Best Places to Work in the Federal Government?
Based on the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) and produced by the Partnership for Public Service and the Boston Consulting Group, the rankings rate government agencies on a variety of factors.
But what does it mean for the average taxpayer? “The public deserves great government, and Best Places offers a road map for how to get there,” said Max Stier, the partnership’s president and CEO.
This project is being published in collaboration with the Partnership for Public Service and Boston Consulting Group, which together produce the annual Best Places to Work in the Federal Government rankings. The rankings are based on the annual Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey conducted by the Office of Personnel Management and 14 other agencies’ independent surveys.
Surveys make one thing clear: “Current leadership and mission are the two biggest drivers of Best Places scores,” according to Stier. Election years have little impact on current scores, which were based on last year’s data.
Stier added, “I hope the results will be used by the president and by Congress to hold leaders accountable for their stewardship of the federal workforce.”
There’s much to be done on that front.
Take Congress, for example, essentially Uncle Sam’s board of directors. It is the prime example of an institution that needs to be held accountable for the government’s performance. Capitol Hill’s repeated inability to pass budgets on time severely hampers the ability of agencies to plan, prepare and perform.
The “most important reason” government doesn’t perform better, Stier said, is leaders “have not prioritized the investments necessary to improve the performance over time. And in general, those are people issues.
“We can and should do better,” he added, “and the public would benefit enormously if leaders truly prioritized the health of the organizations they run.”
— Joe Davidson